The Strategic 
			Planning Delusion
			
			By Don Schmincke
			
			“Every year we invest in a 2-day strategic planning retreat. 
			But we never seem to leapfrog the competition. We achieve parity at 
			best, but not the market penetration I hoped for.” �- CEO overheard 
			at an industry conference  
			
			Over twenty years of research finds thousands of CEOs voicing 
			their frustration with strategic planning efforts. Not a new 
			complaint, the issue has been exposed in books like Henry 
			Mintzberg’s Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning or by 
			notables like Tom Peters describing the 10 percent success rates of 
			strategy as “wildly inflated.” It’s not that spending time on 
			strategic planning is bad, but what should executives do 
			differently? 
			
			An answer was recently found in a unique laboratory - the 
			death zone; that altitude above 26,000 feet where lack of oxygen 
			threatens long-term survival. Here, climbers resemble executives. 
			They live passionately while confronting impossible odds. Some are 
			deeply humble while others are psychotic narcissists. They come with 
			all levels of competence, from naive wannabes to elite athletes. And 
			when put to the test, climbers react like executives: sometimes 
			heroically, other times self-destructively.  
			
			Instead of finding 
			new methods that separate great executives from the not so great, 
			the research exposed something else. Remarkably, executives who 
			create and execute great strategies in the face of extreme 
			challenges - let’s call them high altitude leaders - walk a 
			different path. Rather than apply newly discovered methods, they 
			succeed instead by recognizing and surviving specific dangers. 
			Dangers always emerge when executives take their companies to higher 
			levels. In the most extreme situations, on battlefields or 
			mountains, these dangers can result in death.  
			
			Though often 
			ignored in the literature, four dangers threaten every executive 
			team when they engage in strategic planning: 
			
			Fear of Death: 
			Last year at 26,500 feet on K2, an experienced Sherpa slipped of the 
			edge into the darkness. He would fall for several minutes before 
			hitting the glacier below. All the climbers stopped as the fear of 
			death gripped them. This jeopardized what could be a successful 
			summit. 
			
			The same happens in 
			strategic planning. Unconscious anxiety about the death of a 
			project, product line, sales target, market, career, or strategic 
			goal causes executives to freeze. When this happens, strategic 
			breakthroughs are jeopardized as managers shirk great decisions, 
			avoid taking risks, stop challenging each other, and resist changes. 
			 
			
			High altitude 
			leaders free up strategic thinking by embracing death. This 
			unleashes innovation versus preserving the status quo, creates new 
			opportunities versus resisting the inevitable death of a cherished 
			product or market. Ancient and contemporary leaders call it “dying 
			before battle.” Companies facing bankruptcy can experience the same 
			effect; a freedom to take risks and pursue innovative strategies. 
			What decision is your strategy team avoiding? What long overdue 
			actions would they take today if the company was really dying? 
			
			
			
			Selfishness: 
			At high altitudes, selfishness kills people when new strategies are 
			critically needed to deal with injuries, equipment malfunction, 
			limited resources, and threats of avalanche and weather. Likewise, 
			in strategic planning selfishness kills new ideas and covers up 
			problems as executives let personal agendas drive strategy 
			development. Post-mortem business case studies blame corporate 
			failures on reasons like strategic missteps or poor implementations 
			of good ideas. But digging deeper among the carcasses reveals that 
			selfishness alone drove the agendas or cover-ups until it was too 
			late. This explains why resources get misallocated, decisions become 
			watered down and the organizational commitment wanes.  
			
			High altitude 
			leaders, on the other hand, drive from a fervor and zeal for 
			achieving strategic results that rises above selfishness. They 
			inspire a higher passion in others by creating a compelling saga 
			(from the ancient Norse term). For thousands of years executives 
			aligned the masses on strategic execution via a shared drama. 
			 
			
			“Many executives today are taught to avoid the drama;
			 
			and is why so many are outrun by so few.” 
			
			Passion is profit. 
			When passions are greater than selfish agendas, creative strategy 
			emerges. Is your team driven by a passionate saga or just empty 
			words in a mission statement? Or maybe they’re just going through 
			perfunctory planning retreat activities and missing the point, which 
			leads us to the next danger: Tool Seduction. 
			
			Tool Seduction: 
			In mountaineering, tool seduction endangers climbers every time they 
			dress in the latest gear but apply the wrong techniques and 
			behaviors to the challenge. In their overconfidence (or naivet�), 
			they end up lost on a storm-ravaged slope for days while experienced 
			climbers are at base camp having a beer and watching the weather. 
			Similarly, facilitators packing the latest tools and processes for 
			strategic planning bog down progress and distract teams from 
			focusing on the vital issues. But tools are important, right? 
			
			Yes. Tools offer 
			hope. Tools make people feel like they have the right answer. Who 
			dares argue with the ideas from a best-selling business book? But 
			the results aren’t pretty when you get seduced by the buzzwords and 
			cool concepts. Tool seduction detours the planning process from real 
			strategic thinking into a labyrinth of mechanical, analytical 
			processes. This explains why the majority of strategic plans aren’t 
			strategic, but tactical; even though they have a “strategic plan” 
			cover. Executives possessed by tool seduction confuse strategic 
			planning with analysis; contrary to Kenichi Ohmae’s observation that 
			true strategy lies beyond analysis - it exists in the domain of 
			intuition. Why do companies who drive superior market performance 
			ignore industry expert analysis and advice? Industry experts only 
			know what is already known. Your job is to out-intuit what is known, 
			to outmaneuver the competition. 
			
			High altitude 
			leaders don’t get seduce by tools, and avoid the seduction that 
			diminishes intuition. Do your planning team’s tools support creative 
			transformation of your beliefs, or distract you with 
			fill-in-the-blank, analytical processes? Do your tools enable you to 
			act decisively, or just clog your shelves with interesting, but 
			irrelevant, information? Avoiding tool seduction helps fuel team 
			passion for the challenge ahead instead of derailing the team with 
			useless meetings, lingo, and processes. But even if your strategic 
			planning team does it all right and survives fear, selfishness, and 
			tool seduction, it still must contend with the coward within. 
			
			Cowardice:
			
			Cowardice dangerously stops both mountaineering and corporate teams 
			from challenging the status quo, holding each other accountable, and 
			exposing weaknesses. This danger happens as soon as planning team 
			members are too afraid to confront previous violations of 
			accountability or take necessary risks with each other. And it 
			causes strategy failures by stopping the essential act needed for 
			effective strategic planning - telling the truth.  
			
			Cowardice eats truth. 
			Lack of truth eats strategy. 
			
			Initially telling 
			the truth can upset people and cause discomfort, but good planning 
			teams love it and it drives accountability to new levels. The 
			alternative of keeping the truth at unspeakable levels only produces 
			collateral damage - dead-weight ideas and doomed projects. High 
			altitude leaders develop bravery, which allows them to achieve the 
			risk-taking, commitment, and truthful communication necessary for 
			innovating strategy. Rather than reveal the truth about a situation 
			does your team choose avoidance, denial, and silence in order to 
			avert possible discomfort, anger, or retribution? Do team members 
			whisper about uncomfortable issues outside the meeting? 
			
			
			Being aware of the above dangers, which can emerge in strategic 
			planning sessions, helps executives reach higher summits in real 
			strategic thinking; and not get deluded into tactical distractions. 
			The intuitive strategies that result drive much higher market-share 
			penetration, profitability, and commitment.  
			
			
			Read other articles and learn more about 
			Don Schmincke. 
			
[This article is available at no-cost, on a non-exclusive basis. 
Contact PR/PR at 407-299-6128 for details and
requirements.] 
       |