The Net Results
By Peter L DeHaan
first heard about the Net over 25 years ago from one of my college
buddies. He landed a job
with a computer mainframe manufacturer and was assigned to work at a
university. He regaled me
with tales of instantaneously sending text messages across the country
and doing so at no cost. “That
is fantastic,” I enthused. “How
can I get in on this?”
can’t,” he replied matter-of-factly, “not unless you’re at a
major university or work for a defense contractor.”
I was disappointed. My
visions of fast and free communications faded as quickly as they had
formed. With little more
thought or contemplation, I quickly dismissed the Internet as a
non-issue, one with limited utility and no future.
was in 1981. Fast-forward
15 years. Suddenly, it
seemed, everyone was talking about the Internet.
I was perplexed. How
could something so limited be treated like the next big thing?
Had something changed to make the Internet a practical reality
for the masses? Indeed,
things had changed.
soon obtained a dial-up Internet account.
Back then, using the Internet seemed to me to be a waste of
time. It took eons to be
connected, a bit of luck to stay connected, and patience to accomplish
anything useful – not that there was much to do from a business
standpoint. When a
colleague would get email I would excitedly make note of the address,
but would invariably pick up the phone for any communications.
As more people became connected, I tried to check email once a
day, while checking voicemail multiple times daily.
However, it wasn’t long before I was checking email several
times a day and voice mail only once or twice.
Now I have dedicated Internet access and spend all day
connected, receiving and sending hundreds of messages.
All too often, I forget to check voicemail!
recently gave some thought to what my day would be like without email.
Indeed, over 95 percent of my work on this magazine is
accomplished via email. Articles
are submitted electronically, then routed to our proofreaders, passed
back to me, and forwarded to production.
Design proofs are sent as PDF attachments and most progress
reports and requests from our printer are sent via email.
Without email, we would be forced to rely on snail mail and
overnight delivery services, adding to our costs and lengthening our
production cycle. In fact,
if I only had the phone and delivery services for communications, I
would likely need to hire an assistant just to accomplish the same
amount of work. Plus, I
would not be nearly as effective or efficient.
In short, the Net results are great!
is just one aspect of the Internet; the World Wide Web is another
part. Once the realm of
large companies with big budgets, websites are now common for
organizations of all sizes. In many cases, divisions, departments, and
even projects within organizations boast their own website.
Nowadays, an organization without a website is perceived as
second rate or as a non-player. Websites
are also a great equalizer, leveling the playing field between major
corporations, smaller competitors, and start-ups.
seemingly obvious feature of websites is to provide a means for
further communication. Therefore,
a “contact us” page is a common element.
As such, it is surprising when contact information cannot be
found; this is confounding. These
organizations should want to interact with customers and prospects,
but visitors to these sites can’t call, can’t write, and in some
cases can’t even find an email link.
course sending a message to an email address found on a website
isn’t any guarantee of dialogue.
In researching a recent article, I used a search engine and
contacted the first 10 companies listed via email.
The results were appalling.
One site responded within five minutes with a personal
response. Two more
followed later that day, and a fourth, three days later.
But six never responded or even acknowledged receipt of my
message. Now it could be
that a message or two got lost in cyberspace.
That does happen, but certainly not 60% of the time.
another instance, I sent out a targeted email to over 100 addresses
gleaned from printed directories and listings.
Again, the results were disconcerting.
Six percent were returned because the mailbox was full, eight
percent were rejected because the domain name was “unknown,” 14%
were refused because the user name “could not be found” and 61%
did not respond; only 11% replied.
This suggests some
steps to take to achieve the best Net results.
The first is basic, but often overlooked: periodically verify that
your website is up and
running. True, there are
software programs that can do this, but who is checking to make sure
the programs are actually running?
Plus, who is watching for error messages?
critical task is to periodically send out test
email messages to important email addresses.
If it bounces back or there is an error, the recipient or
technical staff can be contacted to correct the problem.
This is especially needed for generic email addresses, such as
info@..., sales@..., customerservice@..., and so forth.
Read other articles
by Peter DeHaan,
sign up for Peter DeHaan's newsletter to receive
weekly writing tips and information, or visit his website:
[Permission is granted to
reprint or reuse this article, provided credit is given to the author and the
above contact information is included. Notify
and a provide copy or link.]